Challenge 5: Enhancing traceability in laboratory operations

June 25, 2024

This blog is part of the blog series: Top7 Challenges for R&D Labs Operations and Digitalization: Insights from our Clients.

Traceability is crucial for laboratory operations, supporting compliance, quality control, and transparency. Whether conducting research or developing products, the ability to trace every step, decision, and data point ensures integrity and reliability.

Why Traceability Matters

Traceability is essential for meeting regulatory requirements, maintaining quality standards, and ensuring scientific integrity. Regulatory bodies demand comprehensive lab documentation and audit trails to demonstrate adherence to protocols, good laboratory practices (GLPs), and industry regulations. Failure to meet traceability requirements can result in severe consequences like fines, product recalls, or invalidated research.

Quality control also relies heavily on traceability. By maintaining detailed records from raw materials to final testing, labs can quickly identify and address issues. Traceability allows pinpointing root causes, implementing corrective actions, and preventing future occurrences, safeguarding quality and consistency.

Moreover, traceability promotes transparency, vital for public trust in science. The ability to provide clear, auditable trails instills confidence in the research community, funding agencies, and the general public, facilitating collaboration and driving scientific progress

Obstacles to Traceability

Despite its undeniable importance, achieving comprehensive traceability in laboratory operations faces several significant obstacles that can interfere with its effective implementation and maintenance.

One of the most prevalent challenges is the reliance on paper-based lab documentation systems. Physical records are convenient when documenting at the bench during experiments and are widely used despite modern digitalization efforts. However, these records prevent automated data access through digital and smart methods, requiring manual searching instead, which becomes cumbersome when dealing with large volumes of data or long-term experiments. Additionally, paper records are susceptible to misplacement and illegibility, leading to potential gaps or inaccuracies in the audit trail.

Paper documentation in regulated environmentScientists documenting on paper in a regulated environment

Moreover, manual data entry or retyping processes exacerbate the risk of inaccuracies and errors. Human fallibility, coupled with the complexities of laboratory workflows, can lead to forgotten or incorrectly recorded data points, compromising the integrity of the entire audit trail. Scientists may inadvertently omit crucial details, misremember observations, or make transcription errors, all of which can have severe consequences for traceability and reproducibility.

Another significant obstacle is the fragmentation of data across multiple systems and platforms. Laboratory operations often involve a diverse array of instruments, software, and data repositories, each with its own data formats and storage mechanisms. This fragmentation makes it challenging to consolidate and retrieve a complete, cohesive audit trail for a given experiment or process. Valuable information may reside in siloed systems, hindering the ability to construct a comprehensive picture and trace the entire lifecycle of a project.

Furthermore, the dynamic nature of laboratory environments can pose additional challenges to traceability. Experiments and processes may undergo frequent modifications, protocol updates, or personnel changes, making it difficult to maintain a consistent and accurate record of all activities. Without robust traceability measures in place, these changes can introduce gaps or inconsistencies in the audit trail, potentially compromising the validity and reproducibility of the results.

Overcoming these obstacles requires a multifaceted approach that combines technological solutions, standardized practices, and a culture of meticulous record-keeping and attention to detail within the laboratory setting.

Current Strategies

 To address these challenges, laboratories have implemented various strategies:

  • Electronic Lab Notebooks (ELNs), Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS), and Laboratory Execution Systems (LES) offer centralized digital repositories for documenting experiments, protocols, and data, enabling traceability and version control. However, their low real-time usability at the bench and complex user interfaces can prevent seamless integration into lab workflows (see Challenge 1: Getting out of paper, increasing ELN adoption).

  • Lab informatics connectivity can establish unified audit trails by integrating distributed systems and enabling global access to the data through the Cloud. Renforced by recently enhanced AI capabilities for querying and retrieving information across connected platforms further enhance traceability and data accessibility.

  • Lab automation is the dream scenario in terms of traceability, as automated systems can run experiments while capturing a wide range of data and metadata in real-time, maintaining a detailed log of the activity, thereby ensuring comprehensive traceability. This is why many organizations are striving to automate experiments as much as possible, gaining benefits in both efficiency and traceability.

  • Mobile devices: For tasks that cannot be fully automated and still require scientists to perfom the experiment, mobile devices with specialized applications can allow scientists to document their work in real-time, enabling user identification, step validation, and audit trail generation (see section below).

Complementing these technological solutions, establishing standardized practices and protocols for lab documentation and data management is equally crucial. Well-defined and consistently followed procedures can significantly enhance traceability across laboratory operations. By implementing standardized naming conventions, data entry formats, and lab documentation guidelines, laboratories can ensure consistency and minimize discrepancies, facilitating seamless data consolidation and auditing (see Challenge 4: Improve standardization of procedures and data).

Furthermore, fostering a culture of meticulous record-keeping and attention to detail within the laboratory setting is essential as human diligence remains a critical factor in maintaining comprehensive traceability.

Mobile Solutions for Enhanced Traceability

While automation and connected software play pivotal roles, human intervention and manual operations remain indispensable in some cases. Here, mobile devices emerge as a game-changing solution, enabling scientists to seamlessly integrate traceability practices into their daily workflows at the bench.

By leveraging voice recognition and natural language processing, LabTwin digital lab assistant enables scientists to capture data, document observations, and record experimental steps through hands-free voice commands, eliminating cumbersome manual entries, delayed error-prone lab documentation or workflow interruptions slowing down efficiency. The audit trail of the activity is automatically associated with the recorded data for improved traceability.

Screenshot of LabTwin app showcasing the audit trailScreenshot of LabTwin app showcasing the user ID and timestamps automatically added to the table whenever a new result is entered by voice. 

LabTwin's mobile platform integrates with laboratory information systems, ensuring that all captured data and audit trails are securely stored and easily accessible for future reference or audits. Scientists can effortlessly retrieve and review comprehensive experiment records, including procedural steps, observations, and associated metadata, fostering transparency and facilitating knowledge sharing within teams.

Beyond data capture and lab documentation, LabTwin offers advanced capabilities such as step validation and user identification. Through biometric authentication and real-time validation, the platform ensures that every action is accurately performed and attributed to the responsible individual, further strengthening the integrity of the audit trail.

By embracing mobile solutions like LabTwin, laboratories can achieve traceability without compromising operational efficiency. Scientists can focus on their core tasks, confident that every step, decision, and data point is meticulously captured and traceable, without introducing unnecessary complexities into their workflows.

Conclusion: Automate or Empower Humans

Traceability remains a non-negotiable requirement for laboratory operations, vital for compliance, quality control, and transparency. When possible, lab automation is a splendid solution to ensure precise traceability of processes. When humans are still required, the latest technologies advances are the best means to compensate the inherent variability of human work with state-of-the art digital solutions.

While traditional lab informatics approaches have laid the foundation, integrating cutting-edge mobile solutions promises to elevate traceability to new levels.

By leveraging voice-powered digital assistants like LabTwin, laboratories can seamlessly weave traceability practices into their daily routines, capturing data, documenting experiments, and generating comprehensive audit trails without compromising operational efficiency or introducing cumbersome manual processes.

As regulatory demands evolve and public scrutiny intensifies, embracing innovative mobile solutions becomes strategic for laboratories seeking to maintain their competitive edge, foster trust, and drive scientific excellence. Harnessing mobile technology unlocks new solutions for traceability, ensuring robust compliance, improved quality, and unparalleled transparency in scientific activities.

Book a short call with our experts to discuss your current challenges and how we can help you overcome your standardization challenges, enabling you to achieve both integrity and efficiency in your laboratory operations.




stay updated

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Ellipse 136-2
Ellipse 52 (Stroke) (1)-1